Indicator Matrix for Fisheries and Aquaculture
Drafted indicator matrix for fisheries and aquaculture in the Gulf of Maine - Full list, includes strike-throughs.
| Category | Indicator |
Scientifically Valid |
Responsive to Change |
Cause and Effect Link |
Accurate Data Available |
Relevant to Users |
Comparable Regionally |
Useful at Different Scales |
Comparable to Targets, Thresholds, or Standards |
Indicates a condition, (ie not a measurement only) |
| Biomass/Population Levels |
Proportions of stock at or above targeted abundance or biomass |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
? |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
| Status of targeted fishery resource |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
? |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Population levels for selected species (could include non-targeted species like marine mammals) |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
? |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Biomass trends for selected species |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
? |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Incidental mortality of species of concern | Yes | Yes | No | Yes ? | yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Canary species trends (scavenger populations, sculpins, forager species) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | ? | ? | ? | Yes | Yes | |
| Bycatch and Discards |
Trends in bycatch levels or rates |
Yes |
? |
No |
? |
Yes |
? |
? |
Yes ? |
No |
| Characteristics of discards |
Yes |
? |
No |
? |
Yes |
? |
? |
Yes ? |
No |
|
| Fishery Indicators |
Days at sea |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
? |
Yes |
No |
| Fleet composition |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes ? |
Yes |
Yes ? |
? |
No |
No |
|
| Fishery effort |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
| Commercial fishing economic value |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|
| Market value for customers |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
? |
Yes |
? |
No |
No |
|
| Impact of commercial landings on State/Regional economy |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes ? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes ? |
No |
No |
|
| Recreational fishing economic value | Yes | ? | No | No ? | ? | No ? | No | Yes | No | |
| Angler satisfaction | No | No | No | No | ? | No | No | No | No | |
| Habitat |
Essential fish habitat |
? |
No |
No |
Yes ? |
? |
No |
No |
? |
No |
| Knowing that there is a habitat subc. these are removed | Areas closed to fishing, both pelagic and/or benthic |
? |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No ? |
No |
Yes |
No |
| Is this redundant with line above? |
Marine protected areas |
? |
No |
No |
No |
No ? |
? |
No |
No |
No |
| Spatial Distribution Spatial distribution of bottom fishing might be revisited. |
Spatial distribution of bottom fishing |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes ? |
Yes |
? |
No |
Yes |
No |
| Spatial distribution of exploited resources |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
? |
No |
? |
No |
|
| Physical and Chemical Regime |
Temperature - Revisit if Climate Change Sub. doesn't take. |
Yes |
Yes |
Maybe |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
| NAO |
Yes |
Yes |
Maybe |
Yes |
?? |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
| Salinity | Yes | Yes | Maybe | Yes | No? | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | |
| Sulfides | ||||||||||
| Aquaculture Indicators | Aquaculture economic value | ?? | ?? | No | ?? | ?? | Yes? | ?? | Yes? | No |
| Redundant? | Market value from aquaculture for customers | No | ?? | No | ?? | ?? | Yes | ?? | No | No |
| Impact of aquaculture on State/Regional economy | Yes | ?? | No | ?? | Yes | ?? | ?? | No | No | |
| Leased acres | ?? | ?? | No | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | No | |
| Production type (for example, bottom shellfish) | Yes | ?? | No | Yes? | ?? | Yes | ?? | No | No | |
Production/leased areas per area
| ||||||||||
Number of farms in an area
| ||||||||||
| Size | Mean length | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Mean weight | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | ?? | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Size spectra slope | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Production | Primary production | Yes | ??, Coastally yes | No | Partly | No | Yes | ?? | No | Yes |
| Secondary production | Yes | Yes | No | Partly | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | |
| Total fishery production | Yes | Yes | Maybe | Yes | Yes | Yes | ?? | Yes | Yes | |
| Total fish biomass surveyed | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | ?? | Yes | Yes | |
| Diversity | Species richness (# of species) | Yes | No | No | Yes, for some groups (not all biota) | No | Yes | ?? | No? | Yes |
| Energy Flow - Trophodynamic | Mean trophic level | Yes | ?? | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Total energy flow | Yes | Yes | No | ?? | ?? | Yes | Yes? | Yes | Yes | |
| Flatfish to pelagic fish biomass ratio | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Maybe | Yes | ?? | Yes | Yes | |
| C/F ratios | Yes | Yes | No | Partly | No | Yes | ?? | Yes | Yes | |
| C/B ratios | Yes | Yes | No | Partly | No | Yes | ?? | Yes | Yes |
fisheries and aquaculture indicator matrix
Posted by
sbelle
at
2007-10-23 06:53 AM
1. suggest relabeling aquaculture category to "Aquaculture Indicators" to be consistent with Fisheries category
2. suggest adding two indicators that are similar to fisheries capacity indicators, leased area (acres) and production type (for example bottom shellfish, suspended shellfish, restoration/enhancement either shellfish or finfish, marine finfish, salmonid)
3. I am uncertian what the difference is between economic value and market value from aquaculture cusatomers. Can you clarify?
2. suggest adding two indicators that are similar to fisheries capacity indicators, leased area (acres) and production type (for example bottom shellfish, suspended shellfish, restoration/enhancement either shellfish or finfish, marine finfish, salmonid)
3. I am uncertian what the difference is between economic value and market value from aquaculture cusatomers. Can you clarify?
indicators for fisheries and aquaculture
Posted by
sbelle
at
2007-10-23 07:03 AM
1.There should be some water quality indicators added. Not sure what the appropriate ones are but decreasing water quality in nearshore environments due to residential development is a BIG problem that has big impacts on both fisheries and aquaculture.
2. Is anyone tracking quantitatively recreation boat use? We are beginning to see significant impacts on water quality and user conflicts with fisheries and aquaculture. How about acres of private docks (presumably everyone has to apply for a permit so it is tracked somewhere and acres of private marinas? Is another group tracking this?
2. Is anyone tracking quantitatively recreation boat use? We are beginning to see significant impacts on water quality and user conflicts with fisheries and aquaculture. How about acres of private docks (presumably everyone has to apply for a permit so it is tracked somewhere and acres of private marinas? Is another group tracking this?
Water Quality
Posted by
Charles Tilburg
at
2007-10-29 07:32 AM
Sebastian -
I think most of the water quality is encompassed by the work of the eutrophication group (see their folder in the ESIP Planning site). However, this is a good item to bring up at the conference call that I will be scheduling shortly for the F&A subcommittee.
Best,
Christine
I think most of the water quality is encompassed by the work of the eutrophication group (see their folder in the ESIP Planning site). However, this is a good item to bring up at the conference call that I will be scheduling shortly for the F&A subcommittee.
Best,
Christine
Fisheries and Aquaculture Matrix