For best performance and viewing, please update your browser to Netscape 7.0, or IE 5.0 or greater.


Promoting cooperation to maintain and
enhance environmental quality
Ecosystem Indicator Partnership
Ecosystem Indicator Partnership (ESIP) > News archive
 

ESIP overview | Vision statement and core principles | Data | Events and documents

ESIP Journal Entry, November/December 2011

Community Counts

Justin Huston

A key challenge that coastal decision-makers face is the disconnect between environmental information and socio-economic information. Most socio-economic info is collected and presented by political boundary (e.g. municipality, county, etc.) versus watershed or coastal area, and this makes it difficult to show the connection between ecosystem health and socio-economic health.

Figure #1

Along these lines, I thought the ESIP community would be interested in the Government of Nova Scotia’s recent success in making socio-economic data available by watershed. Through the NS Community Counts website (www.gov.ns.ca/finance/communitycounts), the public can now find and download census data and other socio-economic data for the 46 primary watersheds across the entire province. Efforts are currently underway to add the secondary watershed level.

Figure #2

I encourage you to visit the site and take 10 minutes to explore the site. Pretty quickly you’ll realize the power of this approach. There are a variety of ways that you can look at socio-economic information by watershed, including the Map Centre (figure 1), Watershed Profiles (figure 2), and watershed comparisons (figure 3). As well the actual data is easily accessible and downloadable for those that want more detail or to play with the data.

Figure #3

Community Counts is a program located within the Economics and Statistics division of the Nova Scotia Department of Finance, established to develop a statistical infrastructure system of information about Nova Scotian communities. For more information contact Malcolm Shookner, Director of Community Counts, at



ESIP Journal Entry, August 2011

Ecosystem health indicators - how did we create a Gulf of Maine indicators and reporting initiative

David Keeley and Diane Gould

While many people, organizations and events contributed to the development of ecosystem health indicators in the Gulf of Maine one can point to at least four key events. The first was the Atlantic Northeast Coastal Monitoring Summit that was convened in Durham, NH in 2002 by EPA and a 17-member steering committee of managers and scientists. The purposes of the Summit were to develop an ecologically driven basis for coordinating selected monitoring programs, to create a framework for a regional monitoring network, and to identify the region’s monitoring needs and corresponding research requirements. For three days over 100 participants worked in plenary and breakout groups to develop a set of recommendations. One pertained to creating and disseminating ecosystem health indicators that are designed to inform priority coastal issues and management concerns. It was envisioned that they would track the overall status of the region’s coastal and marine environment and measure responses to environmental management activities.

In 2004 managers and scientists were convened in Durham by a broad partnership at the Northeast Coastal Indicators Workshop to develop a consensus on a set of indicators within six major categories: fisheries, eutrophication, contaminants, coastal development, aquatic habitat, and climate change. The intent was that regional data would be compiled and tracked to indicate changing trends in ecosystem integrity throughout the northwest Atlantic region. It recognized that while many indicator and reporting efforts exist in the Gulf of Maine, a gulf-wide indicators and reporting program was lacking. The workshop recommended the development of a strategy to create a regional indicators program.

Also in 2004 the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment (GOMC) and its partners focused regional attention on ecosystem indicators and reporting at the Gulf of Maine Summit in October 2004. Through the Governors’ and Premiers’ Committing to Change proclamation that was released at the Summit, the GOMC was called upon to “provide timely and responsive information to decision-makers (including a comprehensive state of the environment reporting and indicators series).”

Finally, in 2006 the Council formed the Ecosystem Indicators Partnership (ESIP) to create a strategy to develop a regional ecosystem indicators and reporting program. The key events already described laid out the guiding principles, fundamental approach, and organizational structure for a gulfwide indicators and reporting program. At its core, the Council recognized the importance of partnering with existing monitoring, indicator, and reporting programs to build on and enhance current capacities in the region. Key steps in developing a regional indicators and reporting program included: 1) harmonizing and building on existing efforts, 2) creating regional indicators, 3) developing a data and information management infrastructure, 4) producing state of the environment reports, 5) building and sustaining partnerships, 6) conducting effective communication and outreach and 7) securing multi-partner sustained funding.



ESIP Journal Entry, April/May 2011

How is Casco Bay, Maine Doing?

The State of the Bay 2010 report, released in October, presents an assessment of the overall health of Casco Bay and its watershed. The report is produced every five years by the Casco Bay Estuary Partnership, one of 3 National Estuary Programs (NEPs) in the Gulf of Maine region. (The others are the Piscataqua Region Estuaries Partnership and the Massachusetts Bays Program). Each NEP is made up of diverse federal, state and local partners and receives major support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. State of the Bay 2010 bases its assessment of Casco Bay on a series of 18 environmental indicators many of which are shared with ESIP. These indicators address Population; Impervious Surface; Stormwater; Combined Sewer Overflows; Pathogen Pollution of Beaches and Shellfish Beds; Bay Water Quality; Inland and Estuarine Water Quality; Toxic Pollution in Mussels and Sediments as well as Contaminants of Emerging Concern; Interior Forest Habitat; Conserved Lands; Living Resources including Eelgrass, Waterbirds, and Invasive Species; Climate Change, Sea Level Rise & Ocean Acidification; and Stewardship.

The report finds that, overall, Casco Bay is largely healthy. The Bay supports a remarkable abundance of fish, birds, and wildlife. Its watershed remains predominantly forested, and many of its streams are home to native fish and invertebrates. Over the past generation, concentrations of many toxic compounds in the Bay’s surface sediments have declined, and less human waste now enters the Bay from combined sewer overflows and overboard discharges. The report also notes, however, that there are problems on the horizon. The region’s population continues to grow, and that growth has been concentrated in peripheral communities. Such a dispersed development pattern changes the character of rural communities, strains municipal and state budgets, and risks degrading water quality, wildlife habitat, and aesthetic quality. Other looming threats include continued bacterial pollution of beaches and shellfish beds from nonpoint sources, nutrient over-enrichment in parts of the Bay, increased numbers of invasive species in marine and fresh waters, and the uncertain effects of climate change and contaminants of emerging concern.

The work of the Casco Bay Estuary Partnership continues to support the habitat protection and restoration goals of the Gulf of Maine Council, as well as working to foster environmental and human health. At a State of the Bay workshop held October 21, 2010 participants discussed ongoing and future efforts to benefit Casco Bay, its watershed, and the region’s human and natural communities. To learn more about the Casco Bay Estuary Partnership, its many participating organizations, and its ongoing projects and products, visit http://www.cascobayestuary.com/

[caption for the included image of the cover of the State of the Bay report] The State of the Bay 2010 report presents a comprehensive picture of the health of Casco Bay and its watershed. The report is available at http://www.cascobay.usm.maine.edu/sotb10.html



ESIP Journal Entry, July/August 2010

State of the Gulf of Maine Report Launched

On 9 June 2010, the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment released the State of the Gulf of Maine Report. The Council has recognised the need to tell people living and working in the region, as well as visitors to our shores, more about the current state of the environment, what causes the changes that we see, and what is being done about it.

The State of the Gulf of Maine Report aims to provide information on priority concerns for the region, which can be used for environmental management, decision-making and education. It is a part of the larger reporting effort within the Gulf, which includes the Ecosystem Indicator Partnership. The report is a modular, living, web-based document that will be updated continually over time. It will be developed incrementally, focusing on those issues that are of greatest concern to us now. At the moment, these issues include:

  • climate change, and its effects on people and the ecosystems that sustain us;
  • fisheries and aquaculture, as two of the most important economic activities in the region;
  • coastal development, which places pressure on the environment;
  • contaminants, and their effects on ecosystems and human health;
  • nutrient enrichment (or eutrophication);
  • aquatic habitats both in coastal areas and offshore, and
  • maintaining the diversity of animals and plants in the Gulf of Maine ecosystem.

Currently available on the State of the Gulf of Maine website is the introductory document, The Gulf of the Maine in Context, and four of a possible fourteen theme papers. The rest will be developed incrementally during 2010 and 2011. Theme papers available on the website are:

  • Climate Change and its Effect on Humans;
  • Climate Change and its Effect on Ecosystems, Habitats and Biota;
  • Invasive Species;
  • Emerging Issues.

Media Contact:
Theresa Torrent-Ellis
Maine State Planning Office
38 State House Station
Augusta, ME  04333-0038 USA
Phone: 207.287.2351
Fax: 207.287.8059
E-mail:

Summary of Online Papers

Climate Change and its Effect on Humans

Accelerated climate change is anticipated to have wide-ranging effects on the future sustainability of the Earth due to adverse ecological, social and economic impacts. The driving force is an increase in the Earth’s temperature as a result of human activities (e.g., release of greenhouse gases and changes in landscape characteristics). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects a global mean temperature increase of 1.1°C to 6.4°C by 2100, which is likely to affect storms and floods, and lead to a rise in sea level (due to the thermal expansion of the oceans and the melting of ice sheets and glaciers. Recent research efforts estimate a global sea level rise of between 50 cm and 190 cm from 1990 to 2100. There are several parts of the Gulf of Maine coast line that are classified as highly sensitive to the impacts of sea level rise because of risks associated with storm events. The physical extent of climate-related impacts will vary depending on regional and local situations. Coastal communities in the Gulf of Maine will be impacted in numerous ways, including: health and well-being of communities (e.g., injury, mortality, migration, crime and security); access to services; design and placement of structures (e.g., buildings, bridges, and utilities); cost of living; loss of livelihoods, and the cumulative magnitude of climate change impacts. Climate change mitigation and adaptation are becoming increasingly important to community management and there are numerous ongoing federal, provincial/state, county, and municipal plans addressing these issues within the Gulf of Maine.

Climate Change and its Effect on Ecosystems, Habitats and Biota

The earth’s climate is changing as a result of increasing anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases. Globally, the atmosphere and the oceans are warming. Atmospheric warming and melting of sea ice is altering the physical oceanography of the Gulf of Maine, while higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) may alter ocean chemistry, all of which will have effects on the ecosystem. Pressures on the aquatic environment as a result of atmospheric warming include increases in water temperature, decreases in salinity and changes in hydrography. Sea level rise is also an important pressure on coastal habitats and ecosystems. These pressures interact with each other and with additional pressures that are unrelated to climate change. These physical pressures may have negative impacts on some species within the Gulf of Maine, but may enhance the productivity of other species. Because the responses to these pressures will vary by species, the overall ecosystem will likely look profoundly different in the future as compared to the current ecosystem structure and species assemblage of the Gulf of Maine. Our ability to adapt to these changes will depend largely on measures taken to mitigate the ecosystem effects of climate change.

Emerging Issues - Circa 2010

This paper is a discussion of some of the emerging issues around the Gulf of Maine (referred to as the Gulf, and including the Bay of Fundy). The focus is on the environment and resources, covering the watersheds (lands and waters), estuaries, coastal and offshore waters, and how society is responding to their care. The paper is not definitive as some issues may be missing and some are likely not yet predicted, i.e., the unknown unknowns. It is meant to stimulate discussion about challenges confronting the Gulf of Maine and to stimulate further decisive action for follow-up research, information synthesis, policy making, management planning and education.

Read prior journals in the journal archive!


ESIP Journal Entry, May/June 2010

Effects of Nitrogen on Seagrass: Results from a Comparative Study

Eelgrass in Lagoon Pond, MA (photo courtesy of Giancarlo Cicchetti)
Excess nitrogen from human activities contributes greatly to cultural eutrophication in estuaries. One symptom of excess nitrogen in shallow embayments is the loss of seagrass habitat. Seagrass habitat provides important ecological services including fish and shellfish nursery and refuge, shore-bird feeding grounds, nutrient and carbon cycling, sediment stabilization, and increased biodiversity in tropical and temperate regions throughout the world. Because seagrasses are so sensitive to anthropogenic pressures and have a global distribution, they are excellent biological sentinels for assessments of estuarine condition.

As part of a larger project to evaluate multiple effects of nitrogen loading on shallow coastal embayments in southern New England, scientists at EPA’s Atlantic Ecology Division have shown how spatial extent of eelgrass (Zostera marina, the common seagrass in New England) varies as a function of nitrogen loading.

EPA scientists applied an empirical watershed model, previously verified in coastal bays of Cape Cod, MA to estimate nitrogen loading rates for 74 small- to medium-sized embayment-type estuaries along the CT, RI and MA coasts. These calculated rates were compared with airplane-derived photographic data of eelgrass areal extent from the same estuaries, revealing a pattern between eelgrass extent and nitrogen loading. When nitrogen loading rates exceed 50 kg N ha-1 yr-1, eelgrass extent declines markedly, with eelgrass generally absent when levels exceed 100 kg N ha-1 yr-1. These results are consistent with other, much smaller studies, and suggest that 50 kg N ha-1 yr-1 is a reasonable threshold for the protection of eelgrass habitat.

Papers presenting the results of this study are currently under journal review. For additional information please contact Jim Latimer (latimer.jim@epa.gov).

ESIP Journal Entry, March/April 2010

Justin Huston, an active member of the Coastal Development Subcommittee.
Images from the press conference releasing the State of Nova Scotia's Coast Report.
In December 2009, The Government of Nova Scotia released the first-ever State of Nova Scotia's Coast Report. The Report looks at the current state of six issues, which the Government of Nova Scotia has identified as coastal management priorities: coastal development; working waterfronts; public coastal access; sea level rise and storm events; coastal water quality; and coastal ecosystems and habitats. Baseline information on these issues, as well as to inform the development of a provincial Coastal Strategy, is targeted for release in late 2010.

This work is being undertaken by the Provincial Oceans Network, an interdepartmental body composed of 15 provincial departments and agencies with a mandate and interest in coastal management. The PON Secretariat is housed within the department of Fisheries and Aquaculture and is chaired by Justin Huston, who is also an active member of ESIP.

"Our focus on the state of specific coastal issues lines up very well with ESIP's approach to regional indicators, and this is no coincidence. Participation on the Gulf of Maine Council and in ESIP, has really helped to shape our approach to coastal management here in Nova Scotia.", says Mr. Huston, "ESIP has brought together a level of expertise and quality of information that no single province or state could accomplish on its own. Collaborative approaches like ESIP are the future of coastal management.".

What's next for Nova Scotia? Public consultation on the Report and the future Coastal Strategy begins this Spring. The Report can be downloaded online, where the public can access the full technical report, a 20 page summary document and six coastal fact sheets. The public is also encouraged to provide feedback on the Report via an online questionnaire.

www.gov.ns.ca/coast
Social Media Release: http://gov.ns.ca/news/smr/2009-12-10-coastal.asp

ESIP Journal Entry, December 2009/January 2010

A Virginian refuge in mid-coast Maine. The restricted tidal flow over the sill allows water temperatures in the basin above the sill to attain a level sufficient for reproduction of the American oyster and several other Virginian species.

Effects of Climate Change on the Macroinvertebrate Fauna of the Gulf of Maine: Past, Present and Future

The Gulf of Maine has undergone a rapid and complex geological evolution since the last glaciation and the biological systems have responded accordingly leading to the globally significant patterns of biodiversity that we observe today. Briefly, until about 7,000 years BP the Gulf of Maine was tideless and lagoonal in nature. This allowed for much warmer water temperatures and colonization by warm temperate (Virginian) species from the south. As sea level rose and larger and larger tides developed, the surface waters of the Gulf cooled and the warm temperate species were increasingly restricted in their range within the Gulf. The Gulf of Maine populations of Virginian species, including the American oyster, became disjunct from the main population centers in the mid-Atlantic region. The process has continued until the present time as the tidal range continues to increase with the result that these warm temperate species are now limited to largely undocumented isolated pockets, Virginian refugia, usually near the heads of estuaries, where summer water temperatures still reach levels sufficient for reproduction.

The American oyster is the most significant of these species. It is especially important because of the ecological services it provides. These services include providing habitat space for a myriad of other species including invertebrates and fishes, serving as a food resource for fishes, birds and invertebrates, improving water quality through its legendary filtering ability, as a force in benthic/pelagic coupling, reducing erosion by stabilizing sediments and as a resource species itself. Recent research has shown that secondary productivity in oyster habitat is four times that in any other, including salt marshes and seagrass beds. Oyster reefs globally, however, are one of the most threatened estuarine habitats with over 85% of reefs having been extirpated. Degradation of oyster reefs has resulted in not only the collapse of an important fishery but also the loss of the valuable ecosystem services associated with oyster reefs.

By their very nature, the populations in Virginian refugia are vulnerable. They are limited in areal extent and the resident populations are small. Given their isolated locations at the headwaters of estuaries it is clear that even a limited environmental perturbation could wipe out an entire unique population. Indeed, environmental regulators are unaware of the existence of relict Virginian populations, hence, they are not even considered in the decision making process. Relict Maine American oyster populations have been isolated from the main populations for at least hundreds of years. Living oysters have disappeared from several locations since colonial times. The remaining populations may provide a divergent genetic resource that will be significant in the face of climate change. In addition, it is important to realize that oysters, and their associated faunal community, were the characteristic community of upper estuaries in the Gulf of Maine. This is the same habitat area where the first signals of climate change are likely to be observed along the coastal zone because the freshwaters entering the estuaries will warm faster than the seawater entering estuarine mouths. There is evidence that another Virginian shellfish species, the quahog, Mercenaria mercenaria, is returning to its historical abundance levels in Maine.

A multidisciplinary group of Gulf of Maine marine scientists is endeavoring to provide the critical historical, environmental, and ecological information necessary for protection and restoration of relict Maine American oyster populations and associated Virginian species. The efforts focus on identifying the present distribution, abundance, and population characteristics of the native oyster for the first time.  Habitat areas from which oysters have been extirpated in recent history will also be identified, as they may now be suitable for restoring native oysters. For further information contact Peter Larsen at .

ESIP Journal Entry, October/November 2009

Leslie Saunders is seen in the field collecting sediments and snails, then Stephen Marklevitz and Peter Walker are seen going up the steps from the beach to the van and are also seen in the fish lab placing sediment in tanks to maintain the animals. Daniel Beach and Leslie are performing some of the chemical analyses in the laboratory. These students were or are enrolled at Dalhousie University as undergraduate or graduate students in the Environmental Programme (LS), Marine Biology/Oceanography (SM), Chemistry (DB) and Microbiology/Immunology (PW).

Chemistry and behaviour: a balancing act

Since a picture is worth a thousand words, this one is intended as a short story. The photo collage briefly captures the steps behind our development of tools to assess the state of a marine environment. We are interested in the answer to the "so what?" question behind detecting contaminants in sediments. Our work focused on understanding the meaning behind the presence of priority pollutants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) deriving from combustion and fossil fuels. These chemicals are hydrophobic and bind to organic rich particles. Levels of PAH have been shown to increase near shore in the proximity of urbanisation and to be related to, in major part, increased traffic.

Our group developed tests to examine how amphipods residing in sediments react when faced with two choices: sediment obtained from their native location and one being questioned because of the chemical content. After working for many summers to ascertain the validity of our discoveries, it was demonstrated that in the case of 5 out of 7 samples, animals will avoid harbour sediment containing PAH at levels similar to those labelled as "probable effects levels" (PEL) by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. This PEL refers to a 50% probability of developing a toxic response. The bioavailability of the PAH was further determined by analysing the PAH body burden of the amphipods. The level detected in tissue extracts was 1,000 times lower than levels associated with LC50 (lethal concentration to 50% of a population). This is the standard used to readily determine toxicity.

Our group also examined the response of mud snails to the presence of two sediments overlaid with seawater, or to just one overlaid with seawater. The response of snails to stress involves multiple steps. Not only can they escape from sediment by going to the water layer, they can also go to the glass surface of the tank. If they are still experiencing exposure, over time they will flip over from being on their foot to lying on their shell with the soft tissue extended, and then later on to being enclosed within the shell. However, unlike the mud shrimp which can only accumulate the PAH, the snails can also transform it. We are now trying to link the fate of the chemical in tissue extracts to the observed behaviour. This would enable us to predict and ultimately to prevent, further deleterious effects.

The sediment area tested for toxicity was previously linked to the bioaccessibility of contaminants to mussels and numerous ensuing levels of toxicity going from the molecular to the population level. The choice of benthic invertebrates is linked to enhancing the outcomes of three pronged studies where contaminants are analysed in sediments, LC50 are determined using various species and the abundance and variety of benthic inhabitants is determined. The above tool would permit a scientist to establish a cause and effect relationship between chemicals and effects. Therefore it would offer an ability to remedy the state of a site, as deemed necessary.

ESIP Journal Entry, August/September 2009

In Duxbury Bay:  John Brawley explains oyster nursery methods to a group of scientists and shellfish farmers who were recently visiting New England from Zanzibar, Tanzania.  Photo by David Grossman.
The Gulf of Maine possesses a significant number of sustainable, non-polluting shellfish farms. Raising shellfish for both commercial and restoration purposes does not require the addition of food because it is already there in the water. Rather, the basic requirements include a good location, knowledge, and hard work. Shellfish farms are actually known to serve as ecosystem buffers to nutrient enrichment because of their ability to remove and redirect nitrogen from the water column to microbial pathways that result in enhanced denitrification. Hatchery-reared oyster seed is obtained from farms along the coast from May through August where different nursery and growout methods are applied. Although site-specific conditions generally dictate growout methods, seed oysters are typically raised in upweller systems and eventually transferred to reusable plastic mesh bags. Farmers either continue to keep oysters in these bags on or off the bottom, or if conditions are right, they may spread (or plant) the larger seed oysters directly on the bottom for growout. Harvest is usually achieved through hand picking, raking, or dragged up with small dredges.

In Duxbury, Massachusetts, oyster farmers have worked closely with the town’s shellfish advisory committee and bay management commission to plan aquaculture practices that avoid environmental disturbance and potential conflicts among the multiple users of the bay. The management plan also recognizes the challenges facing shellfish farmers and includes recommendations that will enhance the success and efficiency of the existing oyster farms. The management plan was developed by multiple town bodies: the bay management commission, the town’s shellfish advisory and agriculture committees, and the Duxbury Shellfish Growers Association. It focuses on a few core interests that include the initiation of a limited-entry aquaculture licensing process that would reduce the risk of uncontrolled growth of aquaculture in potentially sensitive areas. The plan also recommended the organization of a citizen’s volunteer monitoring program that would track water quality and other environmental conditions within Duxbury Bay. This effort continues with participation from individuals within the oyster farming industry and the town has recently been awarded federal and state grants to support the bay monitoring program.

The success of shellfish farming in Duxbury has resulted in numerous benefits to the community and beyond. The annual Island Creek Oyster Festival, held each September on Duxbury Beach, is more than a culinary/arts community event; it generates funds that are used to enhance local, regional, and international environmental and philanthropic projects. One project being planned this year is the establishment of a shellfish hatchery in Zanzibar (Tanzania) to support local food production and economic development efforts. Over the next year or two, scientists and shellfish farmers from both countries will exchange ideas, information, and expertise toward fulfilling the goal of providing a clean, sustainable source of protein to several communities within Zanzibar. It all started with an idea.

ESIP Journal Entry, March/April 2009

Thierry Chopin and his team received the prestigious Synergy Award for Innovation from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

 
The Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) project, co-led by Thierry Chopin (University of New Brunswick in Saint John; member of the ESIP Fisheries & Aquaculture, and Eutrophication Subcommittees) and Shawn Robinson (Fisheries and Oceans Canada St. Andrews Biological Station), and their industrial partners Cooke Aquaculture Inc. and Acadian Seaplants Limited received the 2008 Synergy Award for Innovation in the category two companies or more. This award, created in 1995, recognizes innovative collaboration between universities and industry.

Beyond the monetary value of the award ($200,000 plus the hiring of 2 industrial research and development fellows for two years for a total value of $360,000), what is most important to Thierry Chopin is the recognition that the concept promoted by his interdisciplinary team over the last 7 years is becoming more and more accepted and their tireless work is finally bearing its fruit.

Aquaculture already produces more than 40 % of the seafood consumed worldwide. To continue to supply the demand, aquaculture needs to continue to grow, but it must develop innovative, responsible, sustainable and profitable practices that will optimize its efficiency, diversify its products and help reduce the impacts of its activities. One such practice is IMTA, which combines the cultivation of fed species (fish) with that of species extracting dissolved inorganic nutrients (seaweeds) and that of species extracting the particulate organic matter (shellfish) for a balanced approach to ecosystem management.

With IMTA, part of the food and energy considered to be waste and lost in fish monoculture are reused and converted for the growth of other crops of commercial value, while allowing biomitigation to take place and substantial savings to be made on feed. That way all the components of the aquaculture system have a role in the processes and recycling services of the ecosystem. Product diversification brings economic stability and reduces risks. Environmental and economic advantages of IMTA should also contribute to an improved societal acceptance of the aquaculture industry.

"We are extremely delighted to have received this award, which clearly demonstrates that R&D in aquaculture is very competitive and can be celebrated. We are participating in the evolution of the Blue Revolution by making it greener!" says Thierry Chopin, with a big smile.

More information can be obtained at: http://www.unbsj.ca/sase/biology/chopinlab/

ESIP Journal Entry, January/February 2009

UNE Assistant Professor James Sulikowski, who is studying fish distributions within the Saco River Estuary System, pulling a beach seine with undergraduate student Kristen Kelly.
James Sulikowski, an assistant professor at the University of New England, reports on sampling efforts to investigate the fish community within the Saco River estuary system and adjacent waters.

This on-going project was initiated in the fall of 2006, and has served as a spring board for several undergraduate research projects. Dr. Sulikowski and his students have used a variety of methods to sample the Saco River area in Maine, using beam trawls, otter trawls, beach seines, gillnets, and ichthyoplankton nets.

To date, this research has yielded some surprising results. So far, fifteen species of larval fish, including cusk, which is a species of concern, and harvest fish, which is rare for this area, have been important finds in the ichthyoplankton surveys. Likewise, the surveys for macro fauna have also yielded interesting results. So far over twenty species have been identified within the estuarine portions of the river. These include Atlantic sturgeon, smelt, and blueback herring which are all considered species of concern. Even more interesting is the fact that all species captured to date have been juveniles, which suggests this geographic area may play an important role as a nursery ground.

Sulikowski s research is an important contribution to the efforts of the Gulf of Maine Council. In Action Goal 1 (Coastal and marine habitats are in a healthy, productive and resilient condition), the Council specifically focuses upon habitat restoration. The Council emphasizes habitats damaged by past human activities can be restored so they contribute to a properly functioning ecosystem.

What remains to be done? Dr. Sulikowski plans to continue this monitoring study for as long as possible. In addition, an acoustic array will be deployed in order to track the movement patterns of Atlantic sturgeon within the lower Saco River Watershed. This, along with deciphering the biotic and abiotic factors that are contributing to the nursery area, will keep Dr. Sulikowski and his students busy for quite some time. For more information, contact Dr. James Sulikowski at .



ESIP Journal Entry, November/December 2008

Submitted by:
Andy Sharpe, Science Coordinator
Clean Annapolis River Project
151 Victoria Street, Annapolis Royal, Nova Scotia, Canada, B0S 1A0
902 532 7533


Garlic Mustard Management in Nova Scotia

Katherine Dugas, CARP staff member, holding a pulled first year garlic mustard plant (first year plant is a rosette).

Photo Credit:
Marika Godwin, June 2008
Garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) is a shade-tolerant invasive alien biennial plant, originally introduced to North America from Europe. The only confirmed location of this species in Nova Scotia is in the community of Grand Pré, near Wolfville. Garlic mustard becomes established in disturbed areas, such as ditches, then spreads into undisturbed areas, including closed-canopy forests.

In the spring and summer of 2008, Clean Annapolis River Project (CARP), working with Parks Canada and the Nova Scotia Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal (NSTIR), initiated a garlic mustard management project in Grand Pré. Project activities included mapping of the core and satellite garlic mustard populations, hand-pulling second-year flowering plants at satellite locations and along road side ditches, developing best management practices (BMP) for right-of-way maintenance and preparing a management plan for the garlic mustard population at Grand Pré.

The Gulf of Maine Action Plan recognizes that invasive alien species, both terrestrial and aquatic, pose a major threat to biodiversity, the integrity of ecosystems and the economy. Beyond attempting to control the spread of this invasive plant, the project sought to raise awareness in the local community of the threat posed with alien species, with 119 households being directly contacted.

Due to the reservoir of seeds within garlic mustard infestations, successful control efforts in other jurisdictions have required concerted efforts over at least three to five years. Parks Canada and the NSTIR have indicated their willingness to continue control efforts in the Grand Pré area. Over the coming months, discussions will be held with other partners to identify lead agencies for the 2009 season.

The efforts to control the garlic mustard infestation at Grand Pré has highlighted the challenges of initiating rapid and coordinated response to introductions of invasive species. Partly as a result of this experience, the Nova Scotia Invasive Species Working Group is holding a conference at Acadia University (December 3 & 4) to discuss the establishment of an Invasive Species Council for the province. For more information, contact Andy Sharpe, CARP, 902 532 7533,


ESIP Journal Entry, September/October 2008

In order to study how contaminants may have an affect to the North Atlantic Right Whale we focus our studies on investigating if a compound causes DNA damage. Represented in the picture is North Atlantic Right Whale chromosomes in which they have 42 chromosomes; unlike us humans who have 46. In our experiments we expose the Right Whale cells to a certain chemical and analyze each chromosome for damage (breaks, gaps, centrosome spreading etc.).
The North Atlantic Right Whale is the most severely endangered large whale, with less than 400 animals left in their population. These whales are a coastal species in which they specifically feed and reproduce off the eastern coasts of Canada and the United States. The underlying cause for the inability of these animals to recover in population size is unknown and is likely due to a combination of factors. We (the Wise Laboratory of Environmental and Genetic Toxicology) are investigating the hypothesis that environmental contaminants are playing a significant role in their population decline. We are currently investigating the genotoxic effects of environmental contaminants in right whales by using right whale cell lines. Cell lines are important tools for our basic understanding of many biological processes and it is one of the best methods available to study how chemicals affect right whales. In collaboration with the New England Aquarium we were successful in developing cell lines from right whale lung, skin and testis.

We have found that hexavalent chromium is genotoxic to right whale testis, lung and skin cells. Moreover, using North Atlantic right whale skin biopsies, we have found that the whales have very high chromium levels. These chromium levels previously have only been reported in lung tissue occupationally exposed chromium workers. Although it is unknown how the whales are exposed it does indicate that chromium is a concern.

These studies will greatly enhance our knowledge of the physiology and toxicology of the right whale. Moreover, it will create tools (cell lines) that can serve as right whale-specific models, which can be used to better understand additional aspects of right whale genetics, physiology, immunology and biochemistry, as well as investigations into the effects of other contaminants and infectious agents. It will also allow us to evaluate the levels of contaminants found in the Gulf of the Maine by using the North Atlantic Right Whale as a sentinel species.

Our future work will be concentrated on furthering and completing our contaminant work in the North Atlantic Right Whale. We will continue to collaborate with the New England Aquarium on the right whales and also with Ocean Alliance, with whom we will study free ranging sperm whales. With our future data we hope to gain more knowledge on the toxicology of whales and what contaminants they are being exposed to off of the coast of Maine.

Contact information:
John P. Wise



ESIP Journal Entry, December 2007/January 2008

Gary Lines, Environment Canada, preparing data sets depicting future climate change. Photo Courtesy of Anne Warburton, Environment Canada, Nov 07.
In this journal entry, Gary Lines, a meteorologist with the Climate Change Section of Environment Canada Atlantic, reports on the role of climate change research in informing habitat decision-making.

"Understanding the impact of climate change has always been a collaborative research effort and that is most evident in current work on climate change indicators for the Ecosystem Indicators Partnership (ESIP). Climate researchers at the University of New Hampshire, communications experts at non-profit Clean Air Cool Planet and atmospheric scientists at Environment Canada expanded work that had begun as a study of climate trends in the Northeast United States."

"The results covered a geographical area that included the northeast US as well as Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island thus treating that area as a unified region with respect to climatological change. Such results will help inform ecosystem managers of these changes so that it can be incorporated in planning procedures for the next 25-50 year timeframe."

This group's research included data supplied by Environment Canada as well as results Lines and his colleagues had generated for the Canadian Maritime Provinces. Such research is an important contribution to the efforts of the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment. In the Council's Action Plan 2007-2012, Goal 1 ("Coastal and marine habitats are in a healthy, productive and resilient condition") contains at least seven separate activities directly related to expanding our understanding of climate change in the marine environment.

What are the next steps for this group? The Indicator results will be expanded to include future projections and profiled to reflect changes that would direct impact on many of the Gulf of Maine habitat priorities. As Chair of the Climate Change working Group in ESIP, Mr. Lines will continue to bring the Canadian perspective to the table and collaborate with US colleagues in generating relevant results for the Gulf of Maine Marine Environment. For more information, contact Gary Lines at 902-426-5739.


ESIP Journal Entry, October 2007

In this journal entry, Adria Elskus, a research biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), reports on collecting fish, worms, and bivalves in August 2007 from areas above and below the Veazie and Great Works Dams along the Penobscot River in Maine. These dams are slated for removal, opening greater reaches of the river for migration of native fish, specifically the Atlantic salmon.
Read journal entry

Adria Elskus USGS biologist Adria Elskus, who is studying contaminant levels in fishes and invertebrates in the Penobscot River and other rivers in the Gulf of Maine watershed, dissects a fish specimen.

ESIP and the Climate Change Network joint meeting
The Ecosystem Indicator Partnership (ESIP) and Climate Change Network held a successful joint meeting on June 11, 2007, in New Brunswick. Thanks to the energy and ideas of the attendees, ESIP has advanced significantly towards the short-term goal of deciding upon two or three initial priority indicators in each of the six focus areas (contaminants, coastal development, climate change, aquatic habitats, eutrophication, and fisheries/aquaculture). You can access two of the presentations given at the meeting and a summary of the ESIP portion of the meeting through the links provided below. If you have specific questions or would like to join in this process, please contact Christine Tilburg.

ESIP and the Climate Change Network launch
ESIP and the Climate Change Network announce an upcoming joint meeting on June 11, 2007, in New Brunswick. The ESIP portion of the meeting will focus on work in the six ESIP subcommittees (climate change, contaminants, coastal development, eutrophication, fisheries/aquaculture, and aquatic habitats) to determine initial 2-3 indicators for publishing in regional reporting. Discussions will also focus on the specific effects that climate change might have on indicators in the Gulf of Maine. Attendance at the ESIP/CNN event is free but space is limited. Please submit the registration form (PDF, 34 KB) and book your room with the Fairmont Algonquinn. For specific information on the agenda or ride and room sharing, please contact Christine Tilburg.

Request for Proposals (RFP) for geospatial mapping application
The Ecosystem Indicator Partnership (ESIP) has released a technical development vendor Request for Proposal (RFP) for the current GeoConnections project. The primary goal of this project is to deliver an innovative geospatial application to the coastal management and decision-making community in the Gulf of Maine, which will help them understand the status and trends of important ecosystem data as well as assess the efficacy of their management efforts regarding coastal pollution. The Technical Development Vendor selected through this RFP process will be responsible for the implementation of Open Geospatial Consortium web mapping and web feature services on selected datasets and for developing the geospatial application.

Meet the new ESIP program manager
Christine Tilburg starts her new role as ESIP Program Manager on February 8, 2007.  Christine has just moved from Georgia to Maine with her family.  "For a number of years, my husband and I have hoped to permanently move to Maine.  Now that we are in Maine, I have been given the opportunity to start my dream job.  I am delighted to be part of the Ecosystem Indicators Partnership Committee. My interest in understanding human impacts to the environment began when I was a young girl. As an eighth grader, I designed a study of nutrients along highways for a science fair. Throughout graduate school and my past jobs, I've remained focused on environmental responses. I look forward to working with the talented and committed members of the ESIP Committee and the Gulf of Maine Council helping them bring their vision of a healthy marine environment to the people of the region.  Together, step by step, we can implement the 2007-2012 Action Plan."

Thanks to Ray Konisky, 2006 ESIP program manager, for his fine work. Best wishes to Ray on his new position with The Nature Conservancy's New Hampshire chapter.  Ray will continue his affiliation with ESIP as a member of the habitat indicators subcommittee.

 

ESIP overview | Vision statement and core principles | Data | Events and documents

© 2012 Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment - - Site developed by Yellahoose - Hosted by Packawhallop