For best performance and viewing, please update your browser to Netscape 7.0, or IE 5.0 or greater.


Promoting cooperation to maintain and
enhance environmental quality
The Gulf of Maine Habitat Restoration and Conservation Initiative
 
About | Documents | Participants | Projects | Resources | Submit a Project | Contact Us
 
The Gulf of Maine Habitat Restoration and Conservation Initiative is a collaborative, public-private effort that is working to develop and implement a unified habitat restoration and land conservation strategy for the Gulf of Maine.
The Gulf of Maine and its abundant biological diversity are vital to human health and the region's economy. Millions of people depend on the Gulf of Maine for food, recreation, and transportation. It is a unique ecosystem, whose beauty and bounty enrich the lives of all who live, work and visit there. Yet each day, the waters of the Gulf of Maine watershed — its streams, lakes, bays, and beaches — are damaged by untreated sewage, toxic pollution, invasive species, and loss of wildlife habitat. Many diverse initiatives are underway addressing some of the problems, but a unified and comprehensive plan is needed. There are manageable solutions, but if we wait the problems only get worse and the solutions more expensive.

[ Back to Top of Page]

About
 
A collaborative, public-private effort working to develop and implement a unified habitat restoration and land conservation strategy for the Gulf of Maine.
The process of creating a collaborative habitat restoration effort has several components. The first draws on the region's existing restoration plans and programs to identify what should be included in a comprehensive habitat restoration strategy. After several meetings collaboration partners refined a set of "issue areas" that are outlined in the table below. We are currently determining the costs and timeframes for restoration activities in each of the three Gulf of Maine states. (We are also exploring a parallel process for Nova Scotia and New Brunswick). We will also work to fund and implement the strategy. Restoration priorities currently under consideration include 1) Conserving and restoring Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and Populations, 2) Improving Coastal water quality, 3) Combating invasive species in the coastal and marine environment, 4) Retrieving abandoned fishing gear and other debris, 5) Adapting to the impacts of climate change, 6) Conducting long-range planning, science, and communication in collaboration with states, Tribes, NGOs (Non-governmental Organizations) and other stakeholders, and 7) Measuring and monitoring improvements (or declines) over time.

This process is intended to be inclusive and comprehensive. All "stakeholders" in the Gulf of Maine are invited to participate and to suggest restoration and protection projects. Please see the Submit a Project form.

[ Back to Top of Page]

Documents
 
Important documents from the Gulf of Maine Habitat Restoration and Conservation Initiative.
Participants
 
Participating Organizations
The following organizations are currently working together to create a comprehensive habitat restoration and land conservation strategy for the Gulf of Maine. The informal coalition is open to all and is growing daily, and the list will be updated regularly. If you would like your organization included, please contact us.

US Federal Agencies
  • The Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment
  • Nature Trust of New Brunswick
  • US Federal Agencies
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Environmental Protection Agency
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service
  • US Army Corps of Engineers

State Agencies
  • Maine Department of Marine Resources
  • Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
  • Maine Department of Conservation
  • Maine State Planning Office - Maine Coastal Program
  • Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management
  • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
  • Massachusetts Division of Ecological Restoration
  • New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services
  • New Hampshire Department of Fish & Game
  • New Hampshire Sea Grant & UNH Cooperative Extension

Business Organizations
  • Associated General Contractors of Maine
  • Talking Conservation
  • Barnacle Billy's, Inc.
  • LifeWise Community Projects, Inc.
  • Bunny Clark Deep Sea Fishing

Conservation/Environmental Organizations
  • National Wildlife Federation
  • American Rivers
  • Ocean Conservancy
  • Ocean River Institute
  • Cape Cod & Islands Group - Sierra Club
  • Society for the Protection of NH Forests
  • Casco Bay Estuary Partnership
  • Friends of Casco Bay
  • Casco Baykeeper
  • Glouchester Maritime Heritage Center
  • Gulf of Maine Research Institute
  • Conservation Law Foundation
  • Association to Preserve Cape Cod
  • Saugus River Watershed Council
  • Salem Sound CoastWatch
  • Bear-Paw Regional Greenways
  • Unity College
  • Massachusetts Audubon
  • National Partnership for Environmental Technology Education
  • Maine Association of Conservation Commissions
  • Scarborough Land Conservation Trust
  • Penobscot East Resource Center
  • The Chewonki Foundation
  • New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
  • Portland North Land Trust Collaborative 
  • Urban Harbors Institute
  • The Nature Conservancy, New Hampshire Chapter
  • The Lobster Conservancy
  • Sound Seas
  • BioDiversity Research Institute

[ Back to Top of Page]

Projects
 

Protect and Restore Fish and Wildlife Habitat and Populations

Examples of Issues

Potential responses

Many commercial fisheries are in poor condition and as a result the resilience of coastal economies and ecosystems is threatened.

Drawing from principles of ecosystem based management, marine spatial planning, and other best practices, assist managers and stakeholders in developing recovery alternatives that facilitate economic and ecosystem resilience .

Thousands of barriers to prime aquatic habitats hinder fish restoration efforts and degrade aquatic ecosystem health.

Develop aquatic habitat restoration strategies that fully assess/prioritize regional impacts and implement corrective actions in an integrated fashion.

Coastal development and habitat loss imperils plant and animal populations.

Assess, regulate and negotiate land protection and acquisition as needed to protect priority habitats, including the coastal upland buffer zone.

Salt marsh ecological functions and services to people are degraded.

Restore natural hydrology, morphology, and control invasive plant and animal species. Use acquisition, regulation, and other means to protect adjacent uplands.

Better data and planning are needed to ensure efficient and adequate restoration and conservation of fish and wildlife habitat, including the following:

Determine needs and conduct appropriate research and planning

Information on the amount and distributions of nearshore subtidal habitat is lacking. 

Develop a gulf-wide program to comprehensively map nearshore subtidal habitats.

Few protocols exist for assessing improvements to fish and wildlife populations resulting from habitat restoration efforts. 

Develop and implement ecologically relevant goals and protocols for measuring and monitoring success of fish and wildlife restoration programs.

Location and siting of offshore wind energy operations may exacerbate habitat loss  

Coordinate offshore energy planning with long term marine planning effort and land acquisition planning

Marine fish spawning grounds need special protection.  

Map and work to protect all spawning ground habitat used by fish in the Gulf

Ecological function and ecological services value, as well as economic value of restored and conserved ecosystem need to be established. 

Commission study on economic value of ecosystem services, and economic impacts of restoration and conservation efforts

Need to focus on critical assessment of fish and wildlife habitats and develop priority list of most sensitive areas 

Effort should link mapping and critical assessment efforts

Build upon/refine existing data sets e.g. Atlantic Coast Joint Venture, Essential Fish Habitats, Bird conservation regions designated area. 

Need support for large scale synthesis of existing data sets

Coordination and standardization is needed for data collected by community groups. 

Work with community groups to establish additional shared criteria and standards for collecting and sharing data.

 

Remove Marine Debris

Examples of Issues

Potential responses

Abandoned fishing gear is hazardous to living resources and fishermen.

Remove gear on sea floor & in water column.

Debris along shorelines is hazardous and represents public health and ecological risk.

Remove and dispose of debris; Target debris abatement at its sources.

 

Assess and Reduce Toxic Pollution

 

Examples of Issues

Potential responses

Contaminant levels in the environment exceed levels warranting public health and ecological concern.

• Identify and remediate toxic hot spots

• Facilitate safe disposal of toxic materials (e.g. waste oil from fishing/recreational vessels)

• Reduce atmospheric and other diffuse sources of toxic contaminant releases

Toxic contaminant concentrations, spatial distributions and health/ecological effects are not sufficiently understood to confidently assess their implications on human and ecosystem health and guide corrective actions

Increase the geographic range and frequency of sampling

• Expand the range of species and sampling media used

• Explore trophic linkages between species to confidently characterize human health/ecological risk

• Prioritize regionally relevant chemicals of concern with attention to "emerging" contaminants

• Refine tools for understanding risk to human and ecosystem health

 There is insufficient progress in abating regionally important airborne toxic contaminants.

Develop policy tools to effectively address diffuse sources of toxics

 

Prevent and Control Invasive Species

Examples of Issues

Potential responses

Protocols are needed for early detection, eradication, and control of invasive species

• Support research into efficacy of known control measures

• Develop and implement risk assessments for existing and incipient introductions as well as known transport vectors

• Improve monitoring for early detection

Enhanced regulations and enforcement are needed

• Develop science-based policy recommendations and enhance the capacity of states to minimize introduction through enforcement action

Need to prevent transport and dispersal of Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS)

 

• Support on-the-ground efforts to restore degraded systems

• Support early detection and eradication efforts

• Minimize disturbance that facilitates the spread of AIS

Support research into the role of activities and industries in reporting AIS

 --Commercial shipping

  --Recreational boating

  --Fishing and aquaculture

  --Research and education

  --The pet trade

 

Improve Coastal Water Quality (Water Quality is the basis for restoration, and protection)

Examples of Issues

Potential responses

Improve water quality for impaired waters.   Maintain water quality for non-impaired waters.  Is the Clean Water Act enough?

We do not know the water quality of the Gulf of Maine from a system perspective

 

Create water quality goals that are relevant to the range of ecosystem/human needs and are informed by historical baselines.

TMDL areas need to be more comprehensive.

Clarify Anti-degradation policies, and implement policies.  

Ecologically comprehensive water quality assessments and monitoring are lacking.

Collect needs assessments from the states (SRF, 319, storm water MS4’s, stimulus monies), town plans; review for comprehensive data coverage; and design assessments for “missing” data.   Develop comprehensive monitoring plans at all levels of geographic scales.

Failing residential septic systems contaminate local waters and shellfish beds.

Implement correct site selection; identify non-compliant systems; repair systems; maintain systems; improve technology; expand municipal sewage treatment infrastructure.  

Inadequate municipal sewage treatment and combined sewer outfalls discharge pollutants into aquatic resources.

Upgrade systems based on ecologically appropriate standards (nutrient remove).  Advance technology to improve the unintended results of higher energy consumption.  Increase funding for SRF.

Non-point source pollution, including air deposition, impairs coastal, near waters, and blue water ecosystem function.

Identify, correct and prevent non-point sources.  Identify sources, develop additional sources (cranberry farms, horse farms, etc.).  Gather current comprehensive data sources, and supplement that data.  Review current management practices (land use), and supplement these practices.  Implement management practices and assess progress.  Understand the link between estuarine and blue water.

Sewage discharges from vessels degrade coastal water quality.

Increase infrastructure of vessel sewage disposal, designate and enforce “no discharge zones”.   Improve Marine Sanitation Device (MSD) Type III technology, revise standards.

 

Promote Ecosystem Resilience to Climate Change

Examples of Issues

Potential responses

There is no coordinated establishment of climate change readiness priorities/policies.

Reassess state & provincial programs/policies in light of climate change projections.

Data and standardized methods for vulnerability assessments of at-risk coastal natural resources and infrastructure are lacking.

Design vulnerability assessments, collect baseline data; implement monitoring and modeling.

There are no adaptation or resiliency plans for natural resources important to human communities.

Prioritize at-risk resources for acquisition and regulatory protection to facilitate resiliency in coastal ecosystems and economies.

Climate-driven geographic shifts in plants and animals threaten ecosystem integrity and coastal economies.

Reduce stressors to species such as overexploitation and habitat loss.

Land-use guidelines do not yet adequately consider climate change projections.

Update zoning, flood maps, open space ordinances.

Storm intensity/frequency is projected to degrade water quality.

Reassess stormwater discharge guidelines.

 

Long-range planning, science, and communication

Examples of Issues

Potential responses

Existing sub-regional plans for habitat restoration and conservation were developed independently by various public and non-profit organizations, at different times and for different purposes.

Gather seminal plans and synthesize key results and recommendations. Contact lead organizations and document plan development and implementation lessons-learned. Inquire how organizations can improve collaboration and communications.

Messages by public and non-profit organizations about restoration and conservation are sometimes confusing or contradictory.

Develop shared communications tools, resources and messages; provide communications training as needed to participating organizations.

 

Numerous aspects of the coastal and marine

environment remain unexamined by science,

and their implications and interactions little

understood.

Engage academic and research institutions, user groups and managers in a concerted effort to secure resources to address priority science gaps.

 

Restoration and conservation efforts are accomplished on a site-by-site basis do not explicitly address broader ecosystem management considerations.

Choose one or more geographic regions and over 2-3 years demonstrate how a more integrated investment strategy can produce greater environmental results. (e.g., sewage upgrades, remove abandoned gear, install boat pump-outs, address non-point sources that close shellfish flats, etc.)

The public and decision-makers are not sufficiently aware of the region’s restoration and conservation needs nor of the benefits (e.g., economic, social, environmental) when restoration or conservation is performed.

Identify priority audiences and learn of effective messaging.  Provide educational and outreach opportunities to increase public and decision-maker understanding of coastal resources and the need to conserve and/or restore them.

Staff capacity in municipal, provincial, state, and federal agencies is insufficient to manage increases in funding for restoration and conservation in the Gulf of Maine.

 

As funding levels for restoration and conservation increase, appropriate staffing levels for planning, implementation, oversight, and evaluation need to be determined and put in place.



[ Back to Top of Page]

Resources
 
The following websites have additional information on a variety of ecosystem restoration topics.

To suggest additional links, please contact Peter Alexander

[ Back to Top of Page]

Submit a Project
 
To enter a restoration project use the form below. Please use the Project Description field to enter any additional information about the project, such as its importance in the ecosystem, ancillary benefits, agencies involved, etc.
Project Info denotes required information. Email address is for contact purposes only.

Project Name
Project Status
Location ,
Cost Estimate
Timeline
Description (optional project narrative)
Website or URL (optional)

Project Contact Info
Contact Name
Email


[ Back to Top of Page]

Support & Sponsors
 

Generous support for the Gulf of Maine Habitat Restoration and Conservation Initiative was provided by the Otto Haas Charitable Trust 2 Fund of the New Hampshire Charitable Foundation.


A grant was received from the Kay E. Dopp Fund of the Maine Community Foundation. For 25 years the Maine Community Foundation has been partnering with donors and community groups to strengthen Maine through grants and scholarships.


[ Back to Top of Page]

Contact Us
 
For additional information about this initiative, or to offer comments and suggestions, please contact any of the following:
  • Peter Alexander - Talking Conservation, (802) 380-3080,
  • David Keeley - Gulf of Maine Council, (207) 549-3598,

[ Back to Top of Page]

© 2010 Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment - - Site developed by Yellahoose - Hosted by Packawhallop