Is there any other information you would like to share with us?
#	Response Date	Comment
1.	Tue, 9/18/07 9:24 PM	This survey was way too long.
2.	Fri, 9/21/07 8:47 AM	This quest-aire focused on EBM practioners, wheras I am a researcher
3.	Fri, 9/21/07 1:35 PM	No
4.	Fri, 9/21/07 7:39 PM	think i've said enough...sorry to bend your ear so long...probably not the response you want from the survey
5.	Fri, 9/21/07 7:51 PM	see my contact info. I'll send an email to you also (but I'm out most of this next week).
6.	Fri, 9/21/07 8:08 PM	Each ecosystem is different; I believe it is important to learn from local experience rather than learning a set of general principles that may or may not be relevant.
7.	Fri, 9/21/07 11:24 PM	I am a communicator by education, experience and training. But marine conservation is a large part of my work.
8.	Sun, 9/23/07 3:49 AM	This is a positive first step.
9.	Tue, 9/25/07 6:08 PM	My research & conservation colleagues (Heather Tausig, Michael Tlusty, Scott Kraus) may have a different take than I do on these questions, it may be worth checking in with them as well.
10.	Thu, 9/27/07 1:40 PM	Many of your questions suggest answers to EBM exist and that usable definitions are avilable. It's just a question of me being exposed to the answers and definitions as well as the tools for EBM. Even after years of discussing EBM, little progress has been made in getting managers any closer to EBM. If the answer to EBM is "just be very precautionary," then I'm dissapointed. For fisheries managers, if the answer is "just establish a network of marine reserves and dramatically restrict when and where some types of fishing gear may be used" then I'm more than a little dissapointed. I don't want supposed EBM to be the "grease" for management approaches some groups or organizations want implemented. I'm very open to all possibilities and options, but I don't want to be obliged to proceed in a certain direction under the guise of EBM.