|  | ||||||
| Home | About Us | Contact Us | Subscribe | Archives | Calendar | Resources | 
| 
 
Presumed extirpated, surveyors have discovered new populations 
 
By Ethan Nedeau
 
 
	But more on that in a bit.
 
	Not long ago, I drove north along the eastern flank of the Green Mountains before dawn, listening 
to highway music and dreaming of discovery. Morning light filled the valley by five o'clock; from atop 
a glacial escarpment my eyes followed a ribbon of mist hovering over the Connecticut River. I drove 
into and out of river fog for a while as the highway descended into valleys and climbed mountains. 
Then the highway took me away from the river for a jaunt through spruce-fir forests before finally 
wending its way back to the river's silver maple floodplain in northern New Hampshire. The reflection 
of the Dartmouth Range of the White Mountain National Forest was my last glimpse of the landscape for 
a while. I donned SCUBA gear, descended ten feet below the surface, and worked slowly upriver in 
search of the small and cryptic dwarf wedgemussel. 
        The dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta 
        heterodon) is a freshwater bivalve that spends most of its life partially 
        buried in the bottom of rivers, with just the posterior end of the body 
        visible. Individuals are usually not more than 1.5 inches long and are 
        olive-brown or black. Dwarf wedgemussels could potentially live among 
        eight to nine larger and more common species in any single location throughout 
        their range, some of which outnumber them by more than 1,000 to 1 (such 
        as the eastern elliptio, Elliptio complanata). Because it is a 
        species of great conservation concern, surveys are routinely done to discover 
        new populations, monitor known populations and mitigate effects of projects 
        such as bridge and dam maintenance or bank stabilization. Such construction 
        and maintenance projects often cause mortality of mussels by dewatering 
        areas of the riverbed, changing physical habitat or by increasing sedimentation. 
         
	Finding dwarf wedgemussels requires a quirky mix of stamina, patience, devotion and masochism. 
Searchers must look very carefully in the right place. The “right place” is an elusive concept that 
has not yet been fully described; it is the Holy Grail for researchers who study the species. The 
key seems to be stability, a somewhat murky concept that is difficult to measure and might have 
different meanings in different rivers. Distinguishing areas that remain stable in extreme 
conditions - such as droughts and floods - is critical to discovering mussels because they are 
sedentary long-lived animals that are sensitive to environmental changes. It takes time to learn 
to read a river and recognize telltale clues such as patterns of meanders, the slope of the land, 
configurations of riffles and pools and ribbons of different substrates. For me, it's a feeling 
more than a quantifiable set of variables.
  
	Once you discover the right place, finding dwarf wedgemussels is mostly about pattern 
recognition - training the eyes to discern between sticks, stones and other species of mussels 
and learning to read a river on a small scale. It also requires enduring cold water, smothering 
darkness, strong currents and creepy-crawly feelings of spending hours underwater. Even then, 
you might spend hours or even days searching in vain before abandoning hope and concluding that 
it simply does not, or has ceased to, inhabit a river. Patience and persistence sometimes yield 
great rewards. An assistant and I once spent nearly 25 man-hours surveying a short distance upstream 
of a dam and found only two dwarf wedgemussels - the first after 12 hours of effort.
  
  
	Among the rivers where dwarf wedgemussels were presumed extirpated was New Brunswick's 
Petitcodiac. Extensive surveys conducted in 1984, 1997 and 1998 could not find the species, and 
the Canadian government formally declared that the species was extirpated from the Petitcodiac in 
1999 after a 40-year absence, thereby also declaring it extinct nationally because the Petitcodiac 
was the only Canadian watershed that supported the species. The declaration also meant that dwarf 
wedgemussels were officially extirpated from the entire Gulf of Maine watershed because the species 
only occurred in the Petitcodiac (except for a dubious historic record from the Merrimack River at 
an unspecified location and date).
  
	The dwarf wedgemussels of the Petitcodiac River represented a disjunct population - they were 
separated from the species' core range to the west. Although dwarf wedgemussels were historically 
documented in the Canoe and Agawam Rivers in southeastern Massachusetts and in the Merrimack River 
near Andover, Massachusetts, the Petitcodiac harbored the only population farther to the east. 
Watersheds in between - the Saco, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Saint George, Penobscot, Saint John and 
countless smaller watersheds - which support some of the most viable populations of freshwater 
mussels along the entire eastern seaboard, did not support dwarf wedgemussels. This assertion is 
supported by many years of surveys in Maine, where surveyors (including me) have searched over 1,700 
locations since the early 1990s. The Petitcodiac population was the zoogeographic puzzle piece that 
had mystified researchers for decades. How did dwarf wedgemussels ever get that far east? 
  
	Dispersal is one of the more interesting traits of freshwater mussels. Though adults barely move 
more than a few meters during their lives, the parasitic larvae (called glochidia) are released into 
the water and attach to the fins or gills of a fish. Some species of mussels are very specific about 
which fish their larvae will attach to, often using only a small fraction of the entire pool of fish 
species in a waterbody. Dwarf wedgemussels are more specific than many species, and currently the 
only species that are known hosts are the tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi), Johnny darter 
(Etheostoma nigrum), slimy sculpin (Cottus cognatus), mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi) and juvenile 
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Tessellated darter is considered the primary host.
  
	Freshwater mussels are only capable of long distance dispersal during the parasitic phase of 
their lives, provided the fish are capable of, and actually swim, long distances. Of the dwarf 
wedgemussel's known hosts, Atlantic salmon is the only species that can migrate long distances. 
Though glochidia might remain on a fish for several weeks, they likely cannot survive in the ocean 
(at least not long-distance transport), and there is no way that fish could have carried glochidia 
from southern New England into eastern New Brunswick to begin a new population. So although dispersal 
of mussels within a watershed is easily explained, dispersal into neighboring coastal watersheds is 
not.
  
  
	The Northeast Channel, a deep trench in between the Grand Bank and Georges Bank, divided the 
glacial refuge that existed over the northeastern coastal plain into two pieces. Plants and animals 
that had occurred throughout the Gulf of Maine watershed were separated for thousands of years until 
the glaciers receded. As glaciers retreated, terrestrial and freshwater species dispersed back into 
New England and eastern Canada along two routes - one across modern-day Nova Scotia into eastern New 
Brunswick and eastern Maine, and the other into southern New England. Species with strong dispersal 
abilities could have bridged the gap and filled Maine, whereas species with poor dispersal abilities 
may have never bridged the gap. The disjunct population of dwarf wedgemussels in the Petitcodiac 
might represent the only descendents of the populations that endured glaciation in the northern 
piece of the northeastern coastal plain refuge. A few mussel species exhibit a similar range pattern 
and strengthen this theory, including yellow lampmussels (Lampsilis cariosa), tidewater muckets 
(Ligumia ochracea), brook floaters (Alasmidonta varicosa) and eastern lampmussels (Lampsilis radiata).
  
	If the theories are true, the Petitcodiac population of dwarf wedgemussels had been genetically 
isolated for more than 50,000 years, perhaps long enough for speciation to begin. Molecular and 
genetic analysis might still reveal the degree of divergence from species in New England and the 
mid-Atlantic states (because museum specimens are available). Ecological studies could have 
revealed differences in life history traits and host fish. For one thing, tessellated darters 
do not occur in New Brunswick or Maine. Of the dwarf wedgemussel's known hosts, only the Atlantic 
salmon and slimy sculpin occur in eastern Maine and New Brunswick, and only Atlantic salmon are 
known in the Petitcodiac. But other species could have also been hosts. These questions may never 
be answered because the Canadian population is lost - they withstood the advance and retreat of 
glaciers and persisted for millennia of environmental change, but vanished within decades of intense 
human pressure.
 
	Freshwater mussels are one of the most endangered groups of species on Earth. North America has 
297 native species, and of those, 35 went extinct in the last century and nearly three-quarters are 
considered imperiled throughout all or parts of their range. Seven of the 12 species in the Gulf of 
Maine watershed are listed as endangered, threatened or species of special concern in at least one 
state or province. The greatest threats are damming and channelization of rivers, sedimentation, 
pollution (in countless forms from myriad sources) and introduced species. Even stressors that 
have mild effects on their own could have synergistic effects with other stressors and greatly 
exceed the tolerance of sensitive species. North America's rivers have been assaulted in countless 
ways and its fauna - particularly fish and mussels - have suffered tremen-dously.
 
	However, I am not going to drag you through a narrative of doom and gloom. In fact, I am an 
optimist when it comes to freshwater mussels because I have a hard time believing in extinction. 
I got goosebumps when I heard the story on National Public Radio about the ivory-billed woodpecker 
and couldn't help but think about dwarf wedgemussels. Since the federal recovery plan for dwarf 
wedgemussels was published in 1993, surveyors have found nearly 40 new populations in locations 
where the species had been presumed extirpated or in rivers where the species had never been found. 
 
	The largest known population in the world exists in the upper Connecticut River in an area that 
was denoted “historic, presumed extirpated” in 1993. This area hosts hundreds of thousands of animals. 
While studying this population, an assistant and I found 1,441 dwarf wedgemussels in a 120 square 
meter area - more animals than have been counted in all other locations combined in the last decade, 
except perhaps the intensively studied population on the Neversink River in New York. Discoveries 
or rediscoveries of dwarf wedge-mussels in the Connecticut River and many of its tributaries during 
the last decade have given managers an entirely different view of the species, and this new 
information is attributed to sampling effort. However, most surveys were designed to find the 
species rather than provide rigorous population estimates and demographic analyses. We still do not 
know population trends or how stable the species is throughout its range.
 
	Scientists surmise that construction of a causeway between Moncton and Riverview in 1968 led to 
the extinction of the Petitcodiac dwarf wedgemussel population. The causeway greatly reduced the 
migration of anadromous fish such as American shad (Alosa sapidissima) and Atlantic salmon that 
may have been important hosts. This cause-effect relationship has been shown in other rivers for 
other species, such as the alewife floater that parasitizes alewife and shad. But in my long drives 
to northern New Hampshire, passing by 10 dams before reaching the finest dwarf wedgemussel 
population in the world, I can't help but wonder if blockage of anadromous fish passage really 
doomed the dwarf wedgemussel population in the Petitcodiac. The population could have been 
extirpated by other causes such as water quality issues, habitat degradation or a population 
that was so small that recruitment failed and it dwindled to nothing.
 
	In my quest to understand the dwarf wedgemussel and piece together patterns of zoogeography and 
extirpation, the thing that torments me the most is the point at which we conclude that a species is 
gone. Very few mussel surveys have ever thoroughly searched more than one percent of a river's 
bottom. Sometimes it is easier to claim extirpation and write eloquently about causes than to submit 
that surveys may have been ineffective at detecting a species with an extraordinarily low population 
density and patchy distribution. Canadian researchers Andrea Locke, Mark Hanson and many others 
have searched tirelessly for dwarf wedgemussels in the Petitcodiac, which might now be one of the 
most intensively surveyed rivers in North America. Only with great reluctance and years of 
waterlogged shoes did they conclude that the species was gone.
 
	However, I am haunted by names of rivers where dwarf wedgemussels are presumed extirpated, 
because I believe they could be in existence. In remote riffles, always around the next bend as 
the sun sets or as the field season draws to a close, I imagine dwarf wedgemussels clustering 
together to ride out the storm of change that we have created, waiting to flourish again once 
our time has passed. I dream of finding these places in the Petitcodiac, Merrimack, Agawam, 
Canoe, Quinnipiac, Schuylkill, Susquehanna and Potomac - as well as countless other rivers where 
dwarf wedgemussels were never even discovered. These dreams of discovery fuel my long car rides 
through the Connecticut River Valley, entertain me as I move slowly upriver in the muted underwater 
world, and sadden me as I pack my SCUBA gear into the attic after a long field season.
 
 
© 2005 The Gulf of Maine Times 
 | ||||||