Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment

Resources

Identification of Important Habitats in Coastal New Hampshire

Chapter 18. American Black Duck

Waterfowl are important in coastal New Hampshire from recreational (hunting, viewing) and ecological perspectives. One of the species on the GOMC list, the American black duck (Anas rubripes), is of special interest, due to a continued decline in population. The following model for black ducks considers habitat use during four life stages: breeding, brood-rearing, migration, and wintering. Black ducks appear to select wetland habitat on the basis of vegetative structure, perhaps associated with food and cover requirements, (Ringelman 1980).

HABITAT REQUIREMENTS

Habitat for breeding pairs include: (1) nesting cover and substrate (Reed 1970), (2) visual isolation from other pairs, and (3) high quality foraging areas (USFWS 1988). Following hatching of the eggs, hens move their broods to rearing wetlands, often considerable distances from the nest site (Ringelman and Longcore 1982). Habitat requirements for brood-rearing include: (1) cover from predators and weather, and (2) invertebrate-rich wetlands (USFWS 1988). Reproductive habitats (breeding pair, nesting, and brood-rearing) must be managed as a unit to ensure successful production of black ducks (USFWS 1988). Migration and winter habitat requirements include: (1) high quality foraging areas and (2) cover from weather (Lewis and Garrison 1984).

BREEDING PAIR HABITAT

Hens may use a diversity of sites for nesting, covering the range from uplands to lowland cover types. Therefore, we made the assumption that where suitable breeding pair habitat occurred, hens could locate suitable nest sites in the vicinity. A variety of wetlands provide habitat for breeding black ducks. In inland Maine, wetland selection by breeding pairs (pre-laying, laying, and incubation periods) in order of preference was palustrine emergent, broad-leaved deciduous forested, and broad-leaved deciduous scrub-shrub types. Unconsolidated organic bottom, needle-leaved evergreen forested, and broad-leaved evergreen shrub wetlands were used in a proportion less than their availability (Ringelman et al. 1982). Ephemeral pools were important foraging sites for pairs breeding at inland freshwater wetlands (Ringelman et al. 1982). Streams having sandy or stony bottoms interspersed with invertebrate-rich detrital patches were used in a proportion in excess of availability (Ringelman et al. 1982). Black ducks nesting in coastal salt marsh in Nova Scotia foraged in the tidal marsh (Reed and Moisan 1971).

Researchers have documented a variety of wetlands that provide habitat for breeding black ducks, but few studies (Seymour and Jackson 1996) have objectively evaluated their relative suitabilities. Seymour and Jackson (1996) documented black duck use of estuarine, lacustrine, riverine, and palustrine wetlands during the breeding season over a 16 year period. Breeding black duck pairs used the following, in decreasing order: inland freshwater ponds and marshes, rivers, estuaries (not including tidal marsh), lakes, and tidal marsh sites (Seymour and Jackson 1996). We used that information to assign suitability scores to NWI wetland types (Table 6).

BROOD-REARING HABITAT

Hens will move their broods considerable distances to rearing wetlands. In inland Maine, hens and broods traveled as far as 3.3 km from the nest to a rearing wetland (Ringelman and Longcore 1982). In Nova Scotia hens moved broods up to 12 km from inland palustrine wetlands to a tidal marsh (Seymour and Jackson 1996). Streams serve as travel corridors to rearing wetlands (Ringelman and Longcore 1982, Seymour 1984, Seymour and Jackson 1996). Small (<0.02 ha) ephemeral pools were often used by broods en route to rearing wetlands (Ringelman and Longcore 1982).

At inland freshwater wetlands in Maine, broods used emergent ponds in a proportion greater than their availability (based on water surface area) and lakes and evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands were used less than their availability. Dead scrub-shrub, unconsolidated bottom, and aquatic bed wetlands were not used by broods (Ringelman and Longcore 1982). Hens and their broods were associated with larger wetlands having alder, willow, and herbaceous vegetation (palustrine emergent and deciduous scrub-shrub classes). These had greater water surface area than wetlands not used by broods, based on discriminant analysis (Ringelman and Longcore 1982). Wetlands with large areas of open water, submerged aquatic vegetation, or ericaceous shrub vegetation were rarely used by broods (Ringelman and Longcore 1982). Rearing wetlands all contained active beaver colonies. Palustrine emergent wetlands provided structure for high densities of invertebrates, protein rich foods required by developing young. Scrub-shrub and deciduous forested wetlands provide cover from predators and weather (Ringelman and Longcore 1982).

In an estuarine environment along the St. Lawrence River in Nova Scotia, newly hatched black duck broods foraged in widgeon grass (Ruppia maritima) pools within the Juncus and Spartina patens zones of the upper marsh and, as they got older, used portions of the Spartina alterniflorazone in the lower marsh. Black ducks may associate with these vegetative and physiognomic features because of a combination of edge, cover, and invertebrate abundance (Reed and Moisan 1971). Seymour and Jackson (1996), over a 16 year period, observed an association of brood size at fledging and wetland type. Brood size decreased in the following sequence: inland freshwater ponds and marshes, estuaries (not including tidal marsh), lakes, and tidal marsh sites. Greater cover from predators and weather and potentially lower predator densities in palustrine wetlands may have contributed to the highest brood size at fledging in these wetlands (Ringelman and Longcore 1982). Greater predator densities in tidal marshes may have contributed to the lowest brood size at fledging in these wetlands (Seymour 1984). NWI wetland types were characterized as brood-rearing habitat (Table 6) based on mean brood size at fledging.

MIGRATION HABITAT

Black ducks migrate into and through the study area from southern wintering habitats around March through mid-April. Maximum numbers of black ducks occur around Great Bay August through March (Short 1992). During the Fall migration they pass back through from northern areas around October through November.

North of Chesapeake Bay, black ducks feed on tidal flats and use emergent wetlands, ice-free bays, rivers, and coastal reservoirs as rest areas. Eelgrass, widgeon grass, and smooth cordgrass are important plant food items, while snails, mussels, and clams are important animal foods in coastal bays and marshes (Lewis and Garrison 1984). We also characterized wetlands as migration habitat according to their NWI categories (Table 6).

WINTER HABITAT

Some black ducks winter in Great Bay and protected coastal waters, from December through February. During the winter, food availability, disturbance, and weather are factors that affect habitat use by black ducks (Lewis and Garrison 1984). Inland wetlands are likely to be frozen, so only shellfish and eelgrass beds would be routinely available. Animal matter made up the greatest portion of the diet of coastal wintering black ducks in Maine (Hartman 1963, Jorde and Owen 1990). Soft-shelled clams (Mya arenaria) and the little macoma clam (Macoma balthica) constituted 46% of the total food volume and occurred in four-fifths of the gizzards collected from black ducks (n=138) in the Penobscot Bay estuary during autumn and winter. High density soft-shelled clam beds attracted large flocks of black ducks (Hartman 1963). Snails and amphipods constituted 8% and 7% respectively, of the total food volume (Hartman 1963). Animal matter comprised 96% and plant material 4% of the aggregate dry weight of esophageal samples collected from wintering black ducks in a marine environment of coastal Maine (Jorde and Owen 1990). Periwinkles (Littorina spp.), amphipods and blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) comprised 68% and soft-shelled clams 6% of the aggregate dry weight of food items collected (Jorde and Owen 1990). Periwinkles and amphipods are typically found in association with intertidal marine macro-algae.

MAPPING OF HABITATS

Habitats were mapped from digital themes including: bathymetry, wetlands (NWI), eelgrass and algae distribution, and blue mussel and soft-shelled clam beds. These data were overlaid and processed on a cell by cell basis to create grid-cell coverages for each of the four life stages (Figures of; Breeding Pair Habitat, Brood-Rearing Habitat, Migration Habitat, Winter Habitat, Combined Seasonal Habitat). Scores were assigned on a 0 to 10 scale (10 being the most suitable habitat) as follows.

Table 6. Wetland Suitability as Black Duck Habitat*.

NWI CODE DESCRIPTION Breeding pair Brood rearing Migration
PEM Palustrine Emergent 10 10 10
PFO Palustrine Forested 10 10 7.5
PSS Palustrine Scrub-Shrub 10 10 7.5
E2AB Estuarine Intertidal Aquatic Bed 7.5 2.5 7.5
E2EM Estuarine Intertidal Emergent 7.5 2.5 7.5
E2US Estuarine Intertidal Unconsolidated Shore 7.5 7.5 7.5
E1UB Estuarine Subtidal Unconsolidated Bottom 7.5 7.5 7.5
R1UB Riverine Tidal Unconsolidated Bottom 7.5 5 5
R2UB Riverine Lower Perennial Unconsolidated Bottom 7.5 5 5
R2US Riverine Lower Perennial Unconsolidated Shore 7.5 5 5
L2AB Lacustrine Littoral Aquatic Bed 5 5 7.5
L2EM2 Lacustrine Littoral Nonpersistent Emergent 5 5 10
PAB Palustrine Aquatic Bed 5 2.5 7.5
M1UB Marine Subtidal Unconsolidated Bottom 2.5 2.5 2.5
M2RS Marine Intertidal Rocky Shore 2.5 5 7.5
M2US Marine Intertidal Unconsolidated Shore 2.5 5 2.5
M2AB Marine Intertidal Aquatic Bed 2.5 5 7.5
PUB Palustrine Unconsolidated Bottom 2.5 2.5 2.5
PUS Palustrine Unconsolidated Shore 2.5 2.5 2.5
R3UB Riverine Upper Perennial Unconsolidated Bottom 2.5 2.5 5
R5UB Riverine Unknown Perennial Unconsolidated Bottom 2.5 2.5 5
L1UB Lacustrine Limnetic Unconsolidated Bottom 2.5 5 2.5

*Suitability Scored 0 (unsuitable) to 10 (optimum)

Marine and estuarine wetlands having water depth > 1 foot are too deep for foraging by black ducks; these were assigned a value of 0. Within the correct depth range, eelgrass beds (Zostera marina) were scored a suitability value of 7.5 (0 - 10 scale) as breeding pair, brood-rearing, migration and winter habitats. Blue mussel and soft-shelled clam beds were scored a suitability value of 10 for both migration and winter habitats. Beds of the marine algae we mapped in this study (rockweed, Irish moss, and tufted red weed) were scored a suitability value of 7.5 for both migration and winter habitats. Palustrine, lacustrine, estuarine, and marine wetlands were used in the characterization of breeding, brood-rearing, and migration habitats (Table 6) but not winter habitat because of ice conditions limiting their availability during winter months.

COMBINING HABITAT SUITABILITY SCORES FOR ALL LIFE STAGES

For successful reproduction, both breeding pair habitat and brood-rearing habitat must be available, of sufficient quantity, and quality, and juxtaposed on the landscape for successful reproduction (USFWS 1988). Therefore, on a cell by cell basis we calculated a reproductive habitat suitability score as the geometric mean of breeding pair habitat and brood-rearing habitat scores. If either of the reproductive habitat components were 0 the overall reproductive suitability would be 0. On the other hand, the relative mobility of mature black ducks allows them to fly to alternate areas to use supplementary resources. Therefore, to identify the overall habitat for black ducks, we overlaid the reproductive, migration, and winter habitat coverages and selected the highest suitability score for each cell.

<To Download Black Duck Data>

<RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>